[Asterisk-code-review] Create --disable-binary-modules option. (asterisk[master])
George Joseph
asteriskteam at digium.com
Tue Aug 28 09:23:14 CDT 2018
George Joseph has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10006 )
Change subject: Create --disable-binary-modules option.
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/10006/2/configure
File configure:
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/10006/2/configure@8921
PS2, Line 8921: PBX_NO_BINARY_MODULES=0
> Are you wanting me to have a default value PBX_BINARY_MODULES=1 and
> have menuselect entries require `binary_modules` instead of
> conflicting with `no_binary_modules`? If so I can do that easily.
> If not please explain further.
No not necessarily. It's just confusing to see references to "enable-binary-modules" when the option is actually "disable-binary-modules".
>
> FWIW this option does something different than --disable-xmldocs or
> --disable-asteriskssl. Those options control the Makefile where
> this option is used directly as a menuselect dependency. So the
> AC_SUBST variable here needs a 0 or 1 value, yes/no won't work.
Yep I understand that. Can we not use the same plumbing though so we don't need to reference "enable-binary-modules"?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10006
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6b1bd1c75a2e48f05b8b8a45b7a7a2d00a079166
Gerrit-Change-Number: 10006
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Corey Farrell <git at cfware.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Corey Farrell <git at cfware.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins2
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:23:14 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-HasLabels: No
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20180828/8256e84d/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list