[Asterisk-code-review] res rtp asterisk: Avoid close the rtp/rtcp fd twice. (asterisk[15])
Sean Bright
asteriskteam at digium.com
Tue Dec 19 13:55:46 CST 2017
Sean Bright has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/7668
Change subject: res_rtp_asterisk: Avoid close the rtp/rtcp fd twice.
......................................................................
res_rtp_asterisk: Avoid close the rtp/rtcp fd twice.
When RTCP-MUX enabled. rtp->s is the same as rtcp->s, check this before
close the file descriptor. Close the FD twice will hangs the asterisk
under heavy load.
ASTERISK-27299 #close
Reported-by: Aaron An
Tested-by: AaronAn
Change-Id: I870a072d73fd207463ac116ef97100addbc0820a
---
M res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/68/7668/1
diff --git a/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c b/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
index 51e509c..913fbad 100644
--- a/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
+++ b/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c
@@ -3481,6 +3481,7 @@
static void rtp_deallocate_transport(struct ast_rtp_instance *instance, struct ast_rtp *rtp)
{
+ int saved_rtp_s = rtp->s;
#ifdef HAVE_PJPROJECT
struct timeval wait = ast_tvadd(ast_tvnow(), ast_samp2tv(TURN_STATE_WAIT_TIME, 1000));
struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = wait.tv_sec, .tv_nsec = wait.tv_usec * 1000, };
@@ -3498,7 +3499,9 @@
/* Destroy RTCP if it was being used */
if (rtp->rtcp && rtp->rtcp->s > -1) {
- close(rtp->rtcp->s);
+ if (saved_rtp_s != rtp->rtcp->s) {
+ close(rtp->rtcp->s);
+ }
rtp->rtcp->s = -1;
}
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/7668
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 15
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: I870a072d73fd207463ac116ef97100addbc0820a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 7668
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Sean Bright <sean.bright at gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Aaron An <anjb at ti-net.com.cn>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20171219/d3a187ec/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list