[Asterisk-code-review] res pjsip messaging: IPv6 receive address needs brackets (asterisk[master])
Scott Griepentrog
asteriskteam at digium.com
Thu Aug 10 09:23:39 CDT 2017
Scott Griepentrog has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/6215
Change subject: res_pjsip_messaging: IPv6 receive address needs brackets
......................................................................
res_pjsip_messaging: IPv6 receive address needs brackets
When handling an incoming SIP MESSAGE, PJSIP
attaches the IP address that the message was
received from to the message in the variable
PJSIP_RECVADDR. When the IP address is IPv6
the :PORT appended results in an unparseable
mess. By using an additional bit flag on the
pj_sockaddr_print call, the conventional use
of brackets around the address is achieved.
ASTERISK-27193 #close
Change-Id: I12342521f2ce87a5b6e4883d480a3fd957aa9fd9
---
M res/res_pjsip_messaging.c
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/15/6215/1
diff --git a/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c b/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c
index 5c41a70..d31e101 100644
--- a/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c
+++ b/res/res_pjsip_messaging.c
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@
buf[size] = '\0';
res |= ast_msg_set_from(msg, "%s", buf);
- field = pj_sockaddr_print(&rdata->pkt_info.src_addr, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 1);
+ field = pj_sockaddr_print(&rdata->pkt_info.src_addr, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1, 3);
res |= ast_msg_set_var(msg, "PJSIP_RECVADDR", field);
switch (rdata->tp_info.transport->key.type) {
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/6215
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: I12342521f2ce87a5b6e4883d480a3fd957aa9fd9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 6215
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Scott Griepentrog <sgriepentrog at digium.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20170810/701e5f44/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list