[Asterisk-code-review] build: GCC 5.1.x catches some new const, array bounds and mi... (asterisk[master])
George Joseph
asteriskteam at digium.com
Sat Oct 24 16:08:55 CDT 2015
George Joseph has uploaded a new change for review.
https://gerrit.asterisk.org/1524
Change subject: build: GCC 5.1.x catches some new const, array bounds and missing paren issues
......................................................................
build: GCC 5.1.x catches some new const, array bounds and missing paren issues
Fixed 1 issue in each of the affected files.
ASTERISK-25494 #close
Reported-by: George Joseph
Tested-by: George Joseph
Change-Id: I818f149cd66a93b062df421e1c73c7942f5a4a77
---
M channels/chan_dahdi.c
M channels/sig_pri.c
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/24/1524/1
diff --git a/channels/chan_dahdi.c b/channels/chan_dahdi.c
index c17e4f8..697c720 100644
--- a/channels/chan_dahdi.c
+++ b/channels/chan_dahdi.c
@@ -18832,6 +18832,11 @@
cadence_is_ok = 0;
}
+ /* This check is only needed to satisfy the compiler that element_count can't cause an out of bounds */
+ if (element_count >= ARRAY_LEN(c)) {
+ element_count = ARRAY_LEN(c) - 1;
+ }
+
/* Ring cadences cannot be negative */
for (i = 0; i < element_count; i++) {
if (c[i] == 0) {
diff --git a/channels/sig_pri.c b/channels/sig_pri.c
index b009c45..1b228af 100644
--- a/channels/sig_pri.c
+++ b/channels/sig_pri.c
@@ -4680,7 +4680,7 @@
f.frametype = AST_FRAME_TEXT;
f.subclass.integer = 0;
f.offset = 0;
- f.data.ptr = &subcmd->u.display.text;
+ f.data.ptr = (void *)&subcmd->u.display.text;
f.datalen = subcmd->u.display.length + 1;
ast_queue_frame(owner, &f);
ast_channel_unlock(owner);
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/1524
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Gerrit-Change-Id: I818f149cd66a93b062df421e1c73c7942f5a4a77
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: George Joseph <george.joseph at fairview5.com>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list