[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-30274) chan_dahdi: Unavailable channels are BUSY

Friendly Automation (JIRA) noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Wed Oct 26 10:47:09 CDT 2022


    [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-30274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=260506#comment-260506 ] 

Friendly Automation commented on ASTERISK-30274:
------------------------------------------------

Change 19419 merged by Friendly Automation:
chan_dahdi: Fix unavailable channels returning busy.

[https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/19419|https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/19419]

> chan_dahdi: Unavailable channels are BUSY
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERISK-30274
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-30274
>             Project: Asterisk
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: None
>          Components: Channels/chan_dahdi
>    Affects Versions: 18.15.0
>            Reporter: N A
>            Assignee: N A
>            Severity: Major
>
> ASTERISK-29989 fixed an issue a while back where busy channels were unavailable when they weren't.
> Well, we now have the reverse issue: unavailable channels are busy when they're not.
> (e.g. mixup of BUSY and CHANUNAVAIL)
> Ultimately, the underlying issue here seems to be that the current mechanism of determining whether a DAHDI channel is insufficient. If the peer is available but in use, it should be busy, and if it's not available at all then it should be CHANUNAVAIL.
> This is actually not a regression, the problem is in chan_dahdi and not app_dial.
> I don't have a solution just yet but you can assign this to me.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)



More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list