[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-29769) AMI call flow incorrect linkedId for transferred extension after AttendedTransfer event
Joze Zivic (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Mon Nov 22 07:22:49 CST 2021
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-29769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Joze Zivic updated ASTERISK-29769:
----------------------------------
Description:
Example:
100 calls 101 (linkedId: 1), 101 answers, then 101 makes a consultation call to 102 (linkedId: 2), then 101 transfers the call to 102, before 102 answers. When 102 answers, NewState:Up event for 102 has linkedId:2 instead of linkedId: 1. When call is disconnected (Hangup) for 102, it has correct linkedId:1.
Possibly, all transfer-kind events and all asterisk versions are affected by this bug.
was:
Example:
100 calls 101 (linkedId: 1), 101 answers, then 101 makes a consultation call to 102 (linkedId: 2), then 101 transfers the call to 102, before 102 answers. When 102 answers, NewState:Up event for 102 has linkedId:2 instead of linkedId: 1. When call is disconnected, 102 has correct linkedId:1.
Possibly, all transfer-kind events and all asterisk versions are affected by this bug.
> AMI call flow incorrect linkedId for transferred extension after AttendedTransfer event
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-29769
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-29769
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: . I did not set the category correctly., .Release/Targets
> Affects Versions: 19.0.0
> Reporter: Joze Zivic
>
> Example:
> 100 calls 101 (linkedId: 1), 101 answers, then 101 makes a consultation call to 102 (linkedId: 2), then 101 transfers the call to 102, before 102 answers. When 102 answers, NewState:Up event for 102 has linkedId:2 instead of linkedId: 1. When call is disconnected (Hangup) for 102, it has correct linkedId:1.
> Possibly, all transfer-kind events and all asterisk versions are affected by this bug.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list