[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-20325) Comments in configs/func_odbc.conf.sample are not consistent with examples. Missing examples.
Friendly Automation (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Tue Mar 17 08:21:25 CDT 2020
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=249996#comment-249996 ]
Friendly Automation commented on ASTERISK-20325:
------------------------------------------------
Change 13968 merged by George Joseph:
func_odbc.conf.sample: Clarify sample documentation
[https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13968|https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/13968]
> Comments in configs/func_odbc.conf.sample are not consistent with examples. Missing examples.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-20325
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20325
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: Functions/func_odbc
> Affects Versions: 1.8.12.2, 13.18.4
> Environment: Debian Squeeze
> Reporter: Olivier Krief
> Severity: Minor
>
> File configs/func_odbc.conf.sample contains several comments and examples.
> To me, both are not always consistent and some comments are missing.
> For instance, in comments block, option readhandle is listed and option dsn is not.
> In provided examples, option dsn is displayed and option readhandle is not.
> Maybe a comment block explaining dsn option should be added.
> Maybe an example using readhandle option should be included.
> In ANTIGF example, syntax option is shown.
> Maybe, this option should be added the comments block above.
> (To be honest, I checked this with asterisk version 1.8.12.0.
> I think this is still valid for current 1.8 and 10).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list