[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (DAHLIN-368) DAHDI fails to build against kernel 5.0

Alex Regan (JIRA) noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Fri Apr 26 10:24:47 CDT 2019


    [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/DAHLIN-368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=247022#comment-247022 ] 

Alex Regan commented on DAHLIN-368:
-----------------------------------

I'm not sure I understand.

# git clone git://git.asterisk.org/team/sruffell/dahdi-linux for-5.0
Cloning into 'for-5.0'...
remote: Counting objects: 20639, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3910/3910), done.
remote: Total 20639 (delta 13631), reused 20639 (delta 13631)
Receiving objects: 100% (20639/20639), 21.32 MiB | 5.97 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (13631/13631), done.

# git checkout git://git.asterisk.org/team/sruffell/dahdi-linux for-5.0
fatal: not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git

# git pull git://git.asterisk.org/team/sruffell/dahdi-linux for-5.0
fatal: not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git


> DAHDI fails to build against kernel 5.0
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAHLIN-368
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/DAHLIN-368
>             Project: DAHDI-Linux
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: None
>          Components: dahdi (the module)
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>            Reporter: Shaun Ruffell
>            Assignee: Keith Morgan
>
> Linux kernel 5.0 has changed the timekeeping interfaces to fix the 2038 problem.
> I believe the drivers should be standardized on ktime for internal time, but before making any changes to the app drivers, I was looking for some early feedback on the proposed approach.
> The work is currently at http://git.asterisk.org/gitweb/?p=team/sruffell/dahdi-linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-5.0 if anyone has any comments.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)



More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list