[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-28051) RTP engine should only accept audio frames with allowed payloads
Jan Blom (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Wed Sep 12 04:09:54 CDT 2018
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jan Blom updated ASTERISK-28051:
--------------------------------
Attachment: payload1.patch
> RTP engine should only accept audio frames with allowed payloads
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-28051
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-28051
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: Resources/res_rtp_asterisk
> Affects Versions: 15.6.0
> Environment: CentOS 7.4 with Asterisk 15.6.0, PJSIP channel only
> Reporter: Jan Blom
> Labels: patch, pjsip
> Attachments: payload1.patch
>
>
> We run a stripped-down asterisk (both 15.5.0 and 15.6.0) with pjsip channel and only a few codecs since we want to avoid transcoding and other possible overhead.
> Some incoming calls from one provider is setup with only PCMA in SDP from both sides. This usually works as expected. However, a few calls start with a single RTP packet with G.722 payload before we receive the G.711 stream.
> This confuses Asterisk to think the received audio stream is G.722. “core show channel” reports “ReadFormat: g722” even after a second or two of receiving proper G.711 packets.
> Since we don’t have a translation path between our voice prompts and G.722, asterisk complains and call will eventually end with a failure. We don’t have the G.722 codec loaded.
> Since we in the pjsip configuration only allow a few select codecs that we can handle, I would expect audio frames with a different payload type to be ignored. At least as a configuration option.
> Looking at the source, it seems that ast_rtp_codecs_get_payload() (main/rtp_engine.c) should return NULL if the received payload type is not found in the current rtp instance. I have attached a patch that solves the issue for us.
> There are probably other consequences with my simple patch, that I have overlooked. But it proves the point.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list