[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-27448) [patch] Add ability to send progress inband by setting a channel variable instead of fixed config per endpoint
Joshua Colp (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Fri Dec 22 06:39:42 CST 2017
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=241071#comment-241071 ]
Joshua Colp commented on ASTERISK-27448:
----------------------------------------
I think some people could be interested, but I'd also be interested in knowing how chan_sip handled your scenario or if this is relevant to both.
> [patch] Add ability to send progress inband by setting a channel variable instead of fixed config per endpoint
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-27448
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27448
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: None
> Components: Channels/chan_pjsip
> Affects Versions: 13.18.2
> Reporter: nappsoft
> Assignee: Unassigned
> Severity: Minor
> Labels: patch, pjsip
> Attachments: progressinband3.diff
>
>
> I've faced a problem with several voip switches when using 180 Ringing messages after announcements sent over 183 Session Progress with SDP (no audible progress indication after Progress followed by Playback). The solution would be to use inband_progress=yes but this way progress will be sent as rtp for each call, so as well in cases in which it is not necessary.
> So my idea was to set a channel variable PROGRESSINBAND to 1 in situations in which we use Progress() followed by Playback().
> I've added some code to chan_pjsip.c which seems to work. I've opened a ticket here for two reasons: one: the "hack" could be usefull for someone else and second: I wanted to ask whether it is safe to do it the way I solved this or whether I'd need to lock channel->session->channel or something else first?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list