[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-23619) Call negotiating iLBC results in speex error messages and one way audio
Joshua Colp (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Mon Dec 18 10:34:07 CST 2017
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Joshua Colp closed ASTERISK-23619.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Suspended
I'm suspending this issue as Asterisk 11 is now end of life, chan_sip has entered a community supported state, and Zoiper has implemented a workaround. When combined I don't think anyone in the community will actively work on this.
If you disagree and would still like it open feel free to comment and it will automatically reopen.
> Call negotiating iLBC results in speex error messages and one way audio
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-23619
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23619
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: Channels/chan_sip/CodecHandling
> Affects Versions: 11.8.0, 11.10.2
> Environment: Linux
> Reporter: Tamás Németh
> Attachments: bad_android.pcap
>
>
> I created a SIP account in Asterisk 11.8.0 like this:
> [sip703]
> type=friend
> host=dynamic
> secret=zoiper
> context=belfold
> regcontext=belfold
> regexten=703
> callerid="Nemeth Tamas" <703>
> qualify=yes
> directmedia=no
> disallow=all
> allow=ilbc:30
> Then I registered to this account using Zoiper for Android. I enabled ILBC as the top priority codec in Zoiper (but I haven't disabled the other codecs). Now I have a problem with INCOMING calls in Zoiper: I hear the calling party but he/she doesn't hear me.
> I see error messages in Asterisk like this:
> frame.c:936 speex_get_wb_sz_at: Encountered corrupt speex frame; too many wideband frames in a row.
> frame.c:966 speex_samples: Had error while reading wideband frames for speex samples
> I assume, Asterisk thinks that the called Zoiper phone sends it media stream in the speex format, while it sends ILBC.
> First I thought it's a bug in Zoiper, so I reported to them, but they replied this:
> ------ RFC 3264 #5.1 ------
> For recvonly RTP streams, the payload type numbers indicate the value
> of the payload type field in RTP packets the offerer is expecting to
> receive for that codec. For sendonly RTP streams, the payload type
> numbers indicate the value of the payload type field in RTP packets
> the offerer is planning to send for that codec. For sendrecv RTP
> streams, the payload type numbers indicate the value of the payload
> type field the offerer expects to receive, and would prefer to send.
> However, for sendonly and sendrecv streams, the answer might indicate
> different payload type numbers for the same codecs, in which case,
> the offerer MUST send with the payload type numbers from the answer.
> ---------------------------
> The last line is the important one in this case, your asterisk version is not following the standard.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list