[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-26942) PJSIP bundle don't use rpath link if with-ssl= used

George Joseph (JIRA) noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Tue Apr 18 15:03:57 CDT 2017


    [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-26942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=236585#comment-236585 ] 

George Joseph commented on ASTERISK-26942:
------------------------------------------

The first part of the issue is a little confusing to me.  We build and run on CentOS7 all the time.  Are you saying that if you specify --with-ssl with the asterisk configure, we're not passing it to the bundled pjproject's configure?  If so, then yes, that's a bug and I'll we'll open an internal issue for that.   If you're saying something else, please give more details.

Having a bundled version of openssl is an interesting idea but I'm afraid that would't be acceptable.  Unlike pjproject, we aren't dependent on the internals of openssl and that was the reason for bundling pjproject.


> PJSIP bundle don't use rpath link if with-ssl= used
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERISK-26942
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-26942
>             Project: Asterisk
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: None
>            Reporter: Badalian Vyacheslav
>            Severity: Trivial
>
> if configure used wih --with-ssl options need:
> 1. Add -Wl,-rpath=dir to cflags and ldflags in user.mak in PJSIP
> 2. Add LD_PRELOAD to systemctl ENV becouse some dll without rpath will use system ssl lib, this load two ssl libs (centos 7 have other library name) and code have two jump lables. This leads to strange behavior.
> Also for full support DTLS 1.2 and chrome chipers for WebRTC need compile last openssl library. It is very difficult for a simple user, because I have to play with non-standard parameters. May be you add -with-openssl-bundle options like PJSIP?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)



More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list