[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-26050) chan_sip: WebRTC Audio + Video Negotiation Problem
Asterisk Team (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Wed May 25 16:56:57 CDT 2016
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-26050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Asterisk Team updated ASTERISK-26050:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Asterisk Team (was: scgm11)
Status: Triage (was: Waiting for Feedback)
> chan_sip: WebRTC Audio + Video Negotiation Problem
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-26050
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-26050
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: Channels/chan_sip/General
> Affects Versions: 13.9.0
> Environment: WebRTC
> Ubuntu 16.04
> Reporter: scgm11
> Assignee: Asterisk Team
> Attachments: fulllog, sipdebug.txt, sip_integra.txt, sip.txt
>
>
> Im having an issue that I think is on sdp negotiation. using webrtc
> basically is one way audio, but this is not nat related, the problem is when I have 2 peers with audio and video capability, when both have this capability the part that answer the call answers with video even when on the initial INVITE theres is no video, but I think is using the capabilities of the peer instead of the offer. as the ice negotiation use different ports for audio and video seems that if I dont answer with video enable I dont have audio.
> Peer User/ANR Call ID Format Hold Last Message Expiry Peer
> 192.168.99.127 1003 bjkrs1u8ui42ot3 (alaw) No Rx: ACK 1003
> 192.168.99.249 (None) 244fb0d764f9f25 (nothing) No Rx: OPTIONS <guest>
> 192.168.99.124 1001 5a99af5106c996d (alaw|vp8) No Tx: ACK 1001
> I attach a sip log from asterisk.
> Let me know if Im not clear enough.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list