[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-25034) chan_dahdi: Some telco switches occasionally ignore ISDN RESTART requests.
Asterisk Team (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Thu May 21 15:24:41 CDT 2015
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Asterisk Team updated ASTERISK-25034:
-------------------------------------
Target Release Version/s: 11.18.0
> chan_dahdi: Some telco switches occasionally ignore ISDN RESTART requests.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-25034
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-25034
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: Channels/chan_dahdi
> Affects Versions: 11.17.1, 13.3.2
> Reporter: Richard Mudgett
> Assignee: Richard Mudgett
> Target Release: 11.18.0, 13.4.0
>
>
> The fix for ASTERISK-19608 added an escape clause for B channels in the restarting state if the telco ignores a RESTART request. If the telco fails to acknowledge the RESTART then Asterisk will assume the telco acknowledged the RESTART on the second call attempt requesting the B channel by the telco. The escape clause is good for dealing with RESTART requests in general but it does cause the next call for the restarting B channel to be rejected if the telco insists the call must go on that B channel.
> chan_dahdi doesn't really need to issue a RESTART request in response to receiving a cause 44 (Requested channel not available). Sending the RESTART in such a situation is not required (nor prohibited) by the standards. I think chan_dahdi does this for historical reasons to deal with buggy peers to get channels unstuck in a similar fashion as the chan_dahdi.conf resetinterval option.
> This issue proposes to add a chan_dahdi.conf force_restart_unavailable_chans compatability option that when disabled will prevent chan_dahdi from trying to RESTART the channel in response to a cause 44 code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list