[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-24928) [patch]t38_udptl_maxdatagram in pjsip.conf not honored

[Asterisk Team (JIRA)]

     [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Asterisk Team updated ASTERISK-24928:
-------------------------------------

    Target Release Version/s: 13.4.0

> [patch]t38_udptl_maxdatagram in pjsip.conf not honored
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERISK-24928
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24928
>             Project: Asterisk
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: None
>          Components: Resources/res_pjsip_t38
>    Affects Versions: 13.2.0
>         Environment: CentOS 7, Pure VoIP
>            Reporter: Juergen Spies
>      Target Release: 13.4.0
>
>         Attachments: pjsipT38patch20150331.txt
>
>
> When in pjsip.conf for an endpoint „t38_udptl_maxdatagram” is set it will not be used to initialize the udptl structure in “t38_initialize_session”. “far_max_datagram” will be only set from the SIP INVITE SDP MediaAttribute T38FaxMaxDatagram from the remote endpoint.
> The bug was discovered as our ISP does not provide T38FaxMaxDatagram in his SIP INVITE SDP message. The result was “WARNING[3849]: udptl.c:852 calculate_far_max_ifp: UDPTL (PJSIP/versateltrunk_endpoint-0000008b): Cannot calculate far_max_ifp before far_max_datagram has been set.” in asterisk messages and the INVITE was rejected with “SIP/2.0 488 Not Acceptable Here”.
> According to our analysis the root cause is that in “t38_initialize_session” the new udptl-structure is not initialized with the value from “session->endpoint->media.t38. maxdatagram”. The values for nat and error_correction in contrast are initialized properly.
> Therefor if the remote point does not provide a value for T38FaxMaxDatagram the value of “udptl->far_max_datagram” remains “-1” because ast_udptl_set_far_max_datagram is never called which results in the warning above.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)