[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-24283) [patch]Microseconds precision in the eventtime column in the cel_odbc module

[Etienne Lessard (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=222561#comment-222561 ] 

Etienne Lessard commented on ASTERISK-24283:
--------------------------------------------

Yes, I just did: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3980/

> [patch]Microseconds precision in the eventtime column in the cel_odbc module
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERISK-24283
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24283
>             Project: Asterisk
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: None
>          Components: CEL/cel_odbc
>    Affects Versions: 11.11.0
>            Reporter: Etienne Lessard
>            Assignee: Etienne Lessard
>            Severity: Minor
>         Attachments: cel_odbc_time_precision.patch
>
>
> In the cel_odbc.conf.sample file, it's written:
> {noformat}
> ...
> ;	  FORWARD = 25
> ;	eventtime  (timeval, includes microseconds)
> ;	userdeftype (set only if eventtype == USER_DEFINED)
> ...
> {noformat}
> That said, if you use cel_odbc to store CEL in a table where the eventtime column is of timestamp type, you'll only get second precision, i.e. you won't have sub-second precision.
> The attached patch fix that. Tested on asterisk 11.11.0 with a postgresql 9.1 DBMS with a CEL table with the eventtime column of type timestamp.
> Also, if you were using an eventtime column of type varchar, I believe the patch will also increase the precision of the data stored; you'll go from millisecond precision to microsecond precision. That said, personally, it would be fine to have millisecond precision; microsecond precision is not really important. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)