[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (PRI-168) DISCONNECT with Progress Indicator #8

[Richard Mudgett (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/PRI-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=218048#comment-218048 ] 

Richard Mudgett commented on PRI-168:
-------------------------------------

You should not commandeer the {{Proceeding}} application for this as it has nothing to do with what you want and has its own important purpose.  You use the {{Proceeding}} application when incoming overlap dialling is enabled when all the digits are collected.  Otherwise, when you dial the next call leg you run the risk of a T304 timeout on the first call leg aborting the call.  See ASTERISK-15594

The sig_pri_hangup() and sig_pri_indicate() routines are where you *need* to start the busy/congestion tones and call a new libpri API call that will send the DISCONNECT with progress indicator of inband audio.  Modifying elsewhere is *not* the right way to go.  You need to study the sig_pri/libpri hangup handshake to see how it operates and how you could modify it for the new API call.

> DISCONNECT with Progress Indicator #8
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PRI-168
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/PRI-168
>             Project: LibPRI
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: None
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.13
>            Reporter: Armen Karlozian
>            Severity: Minor
>
> Hi everyone,
> As you know, currently when the Hangup() command is used in the Asterisk dial plan, it will tear down both the far and and near end of the call and audio amongst other things.  In addition, there is a way of indicating the PRI Cause Code to the user by entering the code within the parenthesis ie: Hangup(1) or Hangup(16), etc.
> Here is the issue:  We have a PBX connected to an E1/PRI from the Telco.  This is a production system and does not use Asterisk.  On this system, whenever someone dials a number which is busy, for example, the phone's display will show the standard PRI message "user busy" and the user will hear an engaged signal (busy signal).  Likewise, if a wrong number is dialled, the display will show "unallocated num" and another tone or message will be heard.... and so on.
> Currently, we're doing tests on the same type of system connected to Asterisk via an E1/PRI and have found that this does not happen.  Basically, if the user dials a busy number, they will hear a busy signal but they won't see the "user busy" message.  Alternatively, if we change the extension script a bit, we can issue a Hangup(17) to make the phone show "user busy" but then there's no way to play the busy signal because the phone/channel hangs up.
> SO....
> Would it be possible to perhaps create a new function called "SendPRICause()" (kind of like the SendText function for SIP phones) so that we can use that instead of Hangup()?
> This way the use can see the message and hear whatever recording needs to be played to them at the same time.
> An example of its usage could be:
> exten => s-DN_CHANGED,1,Progress()
> exten => s-DN_CHANGED,1,SendPRICause(22)
> exten => s-DN_CHANGED,n,Playback(/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/tel/sorry-number-changed,noanswer)
> exten => s-DN_CHANGED,n,Hangup()
> --------------------------
> Cheers,
> Armen



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)