[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-20933) No CDR created after call has been split and then bridged back
Rusty Newton (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Wed Feb 26 09:30:03 CST 2014
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rusty Newton updated ASTERISK-20933:
------------------------------------
Status: Open (was: Waiting for Feedback)
> No CDR created after call has been split and then bridged back
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-20933
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20933
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: CDR/General, Core/Bridging
> Affects Versions: 1.8.14.1, 1.8.15.1, 1.8.19.1
> Environment: CentOS 5 using Digium yum repositories
> Reporter: Alex Barnes
> Assignee: Alex Barnes
> Attachments: adaptive_bridge.log, adaptive_working.log, cdr_adaptive_odbc.conf, channels.log, debug_1.8.13.log, debug_1.8.20.log, debug_1.8.20_nobridge.log, extensions.conf, modules.conf, res_odbc.conf
>
>
> Scenario
> ===========================
> No CDR record is created after a call has been split and then bridged back. See example dialplan below where a CDR record is created at all points right up to the Bridge command but not after. Reversing which channel gets bridged still results in no CDR, i.e. the caller doing the bridging or the callee.
> In our case the VoiceSafe is acting as an ISDN middle-man to record and log calls before being passed onto the PBX or telco. I haven't tested purely SIP but I imagine it would be the same outcome.
> Note that this was working in 1.8.13 but appears to have been broken in 1.8.14 and above.
> Versions
> ===========================
> All packages installed via Yum.
> * 1.8.13.1-1_centos5 = OK
> * 1.8.14.1-1_centos5 = No CDR
> * 1.8.15.1-1_centos5 = No CDR
> * 1.8.15-0.cert1.1_centos5 = No CDR
> * 1.8.19.1-1_centos5 = No CDR
> Dialplan
> ===========================
> {code}
> [from-inside]
> exten => 321,1,SET(__DYNAMIC_FEATURES=testBridge)
> exten => 321,n,Dial(DAHDI/g1/321,300,)
> [macro-test-bridge]
> exten => s,1,NoOp(In test-bridge)
> exten => s,n,Set(operator-channel=${CHANNEL})
> exten => s,n,Set(caller-channel=${BRIDGEPEER})
> ; Sync variables on both channels
> exten => s,n,NoOp(Syncing channel vars)
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(operator-channel,${operator-channel})=${operator-channel})
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(caller-channel,${operator-channel})=${caller-channel})
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(operator-channel,${caller-channel})=${operator-channel})
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(caller-channel,${caller-channel})=${caller-channel})
> exten => s,n,ChannelRedirect(${caller-channel},test-wait-bridge,1,1)
> exten => s,n,ChannelRedirect(${operator-channel},test-wait,1,1)
> [test-wait-bridge]
> exten => 1,1,NoOp(In test-wait-bridge)
> exten => 1,n,Wait(5)
> ; Hanging up here rather than bridging will results in CDR correctly being created
> ; exten => 1,n,Hangup
> exten => 1,n,Bridge(${SHARED(operator-channel)})
> [test-wait]
> exten => 1,1,NoOp(In test-wait)
> exten => 1,n,Wait(30)
> exten => 1,n,Hangup
> {code}
> features.conf
> ===========================
> {code}
> testBridge => #2,peer,Macro,test-bridge
> {code}
> Example Output
> ===========================
> See attachments
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list