[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-20933) No CDR created after call has been split and then bridged back

Alex Barnes (JIRA) noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Mon Feb 10 09:41:03 CST 2014


    [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=215040#comment-215040 ] 

Alex Barnes commented on ASTERISK-20933:
----------------------------------------

Hi,

I've tested this on Asterisk 1.8.25.0 and it still appears to be an issue.  This is quite an issue for us as we've not been able to update our version of Asterisk from version 1.8.13 for over a year now.

Should this Jira still be assigned to me or should it go back to unassigned?

Thanks

Alex
                
> No CDR created after call has been split and then bridged back
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ASTERISK-20933
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20933
>             Project: Asterisk
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: None
>          Components: CDR/General, Core/Bridging
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.14.1, 1.8.15.1, 1.8.19.1
>         Environment: CentOS 5 using Digium yum repositories
>            Reporter: Alex Barnes
>            Assignee: Alex Barnes
>         Attachments: adaptive_bridge.log, adaptive_working.log, cdr_adaptive_odbc.conf, channels.log, debug_1.8.13.log, debug_1.8.20.log, debug_1.8.20_nobridge.log, extensions.conf, modules.conf, res_odbc.conf
>
>
> Scenario
> ===========================
> No CDR record is created after a call has been split and then bridged back.  See example dialplan below where a CDR record is created at all points right up to the Bridge command but not after.  Reversing which channel gets bridged still results in no CDR, i.e. the caller doing the bridging or the callee.
> In our case the VoiceSafe is acting as an ISDN middle-man to record and log calls before being passed onto the PBX or telco.  I haven't tested purely SIP but I imagine it would be the same outcome.
> Note that this was working in 1.8.13 but appears to have been broken in 1.8.14 and above.
> Versions
> ===========================
> All packages installed via Yum.
> * 1.8.13.1-1_centos5 = OK
> * 1.8.14.1-1_centos5 = No CDR
> * 1.8.15.1-1_centos5 = No CDR
> * 1.8.15-0.cert1.1_centos5 = No CDR
> * 1.8.19.1-1_centos5 = No CDR
> Dialplan
> ===========================
> {code}
> [from-inside]
> exten => 321,1,SET(__DYNAMIC_FEATURES=testBridge)
> exten => 321,n,Dial(DAHDI/g1/321,300,)
> [macro-test-bridge]
> exten => s,1,NoOp(In test-bridge)
> exten => s,n,Set(operator-channel=${CHANNEL})
> exten => s,n,Set(caller-channel=${BRIDGEPEER})
> ; Sync variables on both channels
> exten => s,n,NoOp(Syncing channel vars)
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(operator-channel,${operator-channel})=${operator-channel})
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(caller-channel,${operator-channel})=${caller-channel})
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(operator-channel,${caller-channel})=${operator-channel})
> exten => s,n,Set(SHARED(caller-channel,${caller-channel})=${caller-channel})
> exten => s,n,ChannelRedirect(${caller-channel},test-wait-bridge,1,1)
> exten => s,n,ChannelRedirect(${operator-channel},test-wait,1,1)
> [test-wait-bridge]
> exten => 1,1,NoOp(In test-wait-bridge)
> exten => 1,n,Wait(5)
> ; Hanging up here rather than bridging will results in CDR correctly being created
> ; exten => 1,n,Hangup
> exten => 1,n,Bridge(${SHARED(operator-channel)})
> [test-wait]
> exten => 1,1,NoOp(In test-wait)
> exten => 1,n,Wait(30)
> exten => 1,n,Hangup
> {code}
> features.conf
> ===========================
> {code}
> testBridge  => #2,peer,Macro,test-bridge
> {code}
> Example Output
> ===========================
> See attachments

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list