[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (DAHTOOL-66) Congestion tone for Australia not correct in zonedata.c

armeniki (JIRA) noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Sun Apr 27 02:54:19 CDT 2014


     [ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/DAHTOOL-66?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

armeniki updated DAHTOOL-66:
----------------------------

    Description: 
Hi there,

At approximately Line 66 of the zonedata.c file, the Congestion tone specifications for Australia have the correct frequencies and cadence in place however the levels are incorrect.  The Congestion tone in Australia must be reduced by 10 to 15 dB at every other cadence.  Otherwise, it is very similar to the engaged/busy signal.

As such, it very difficult/impossible to distinguish when a line is busy/engaged or out of service, etc.

  was:
At approximately Line 66 of the file, the Congestion tone specifications for Australia have been in place however they are not correct.  The Congestion tone in Australia must be reduced by 10 to 15 dB at every other cadence.  

Currently it is *impossible* to distinguish when a line is busy/engaged or out of service, etc.


> Congestion tone for Australia not correct in zonedata.c
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAHTOOL-66
>                 URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/DAHTOOL-66
>             Project: DAHDI-Tools
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: None
>            Reporter: armeniki
>            Assignee: Russ Meyerriecks
>
> Hi there,
> At approximately Line 66 of the zonedata.c file, the Congestion tone specifications for Australia have the correct frequencies and cadence in place however the levels are incorrect.  The Congestion tone in Australia must be reduced by 10 to 15 dB at every other cadence.  Otherwise, it is very similar to the engaged/busy signal.
> As such, it very difficult/impossible to distinguish when a line is busy/engaged or out of service, etc.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)



More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list