[asterisk-bugs] [JIRA] (ASTERISK-20538) inconsistent ast_verb numbering
Matt Jordan (JIRA)
noreply at issues.asterisk.org
Mon Oct 29 20:51:18 CDT 2012
[ https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=198997#comment-198997 ]
Matt Jordan commented on ASTERISK-20538:
----------------------------------------
I can't remember, didn't you commit a patch to fix a lot of these recently? If so, does this issue need to remain open? (Erin is working on getting the subversion tab back... I'm practically blind without it sometimes)
> inconsistent ast_verb numbering
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: ASTERISK-20538
> URL: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-20538
> Project: Asterisk
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: None
> Components: Core/General
> Affects Versions: 1.8.18.0
> Reporter: Walter Doekes
> Assignee: Rusty Newton
> Severity: Trivial
>
> {noformat}
> asterisk-1.8.x$ find . -name '*.c' | xargs grep -h 'ast_verb([0-9]' | sed -e 's/.*ast_verb(//;s/,.*//' | sort | uniq -c
> 128 0
> 136 1
> 3 10
> 8 11
> 131 2
> 565 3
> 85 4
> 13 6
> {noformat}
> I.e. 3 uses of ast_verb(10) and 8 of ast_verb(11). Is there a good reason for this? Or could those calls be lowered to the 5-6 range?
> {noformat}
> asterisk-1.8.x$ find . -name '*.c' | xargs grep -l 'ast_verb(10,'
> ./cel/cel_odbc.c
> ./res/res_odbc.c
> ./cdr/cdr_adaptive_odbc.c
> {noformat}
> {noformat}
> asterisk-1.8.x$ find . -name '*.c' | xargs grep -l 'ast_verb(11,'
> ./cel/cel_odbc.c
> ./cel/cel_pgsql.c
> ./cdr/cdr_odbc.c
> ./cdr/cdr_pgsql.c
> ./cdr/cdr_adaptive_odbc.c
> {noformat}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list