[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0019259]: 3 examples of loss of CDR data

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19259 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                one47
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   19259
Category:                   CDR/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           1.6.2.18 
JIRA:                       SWP-3436 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2011-05-10 05:23 CDT
Last Modified:              2011-05-10 09:29 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    3 examples of loss of CDR data
Description: 
Discovered in 1.6.2.18, but looking at 1.8 and trunk, it probably still
applies, as this code appears to be largely unchanged.

If transferring (ast_do_masquerade) a bridged channel into an unbridged
channel, CDR data is lost. I have found 3 scenarios so far where CDR data
or records are lost.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0134712) one47 (reporter) - 2011-05-10 09:29
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=19259#c134712 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
This is definitely "non-trivial in the extreme" - I have found the 1.6.0
CDR update commit from 2008 that brings things to more-or-less their
current position.

Fundamentally, the 3 cases above ought to be treated like attended
transfers of bridged calls - I will do some research, and take the
conversation to the -dev list as suggested. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2011-05-10 09:29 one47          Note Added: 0134712                          
======================================================================