[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018985]: [patch] Can't return to normal ring after distinctive ring on FXS
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Mar 21 14:22:23 CDT 2011
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18985
======================================================================
Reported By: bromont
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 18985
Category: Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
Asterisk Version: 1.8.3.1
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2011-03-16 22:20 CDT
Last Modified: 2011-03-21 14:22 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Can't return to normal ring after
distinctive ring on FXS
Description:
When dialing an FXS line using DAHDI/1r3 (3 short rings), subsequent FXS
calls always produce the 3 short rings even though DAHDI/1 should produce
the default ring. Only after an Asterisk restart can the normal ring be
restored.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0133048) bromont (reporter) - 2011-03-21 14:22
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18985#c133048
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I added p->dintinctivering=0 to line 13282 (rev 301134) and compiled, I
will test and report results tonight. I took a look at dahdi_hangup and I'm
not sure where to reset in that function.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2011-03-21 14:22 bromont Note Added: 0133048
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list