[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013996]: [patch] Presence subscription on Cisco SIP phone needs special Cisco-styled XML
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Jan 21 08:27:04 CST 2011
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13996
======================================================================
Reported By: Nugget
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 13996
Category: Channels/chan_sip/NewFeature
Reproducibility: always
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: confirmed
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA: SWP-202
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-11-30 15:13 CST
Last Modified: 2011-01-21 08:27 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Presence subscription on Cisco SIP phone
needs special Cisco-styled XML
Description:
Cisco phones appear to be unable to parse the existing PIDF XML being
generated by Asterisk for presence notification. I've attached a patch
which produces well-formed (but incomplete) XML which will satisfy a Cisco
phone. The patch as supplied will successfully render a "busy"
subscription, but does not send a subsequent "available" notification, so
presence detection only half works currently.
I suspect the next step might be to watch some CallManager SIP traffic to
identify precisely what XML tags the phone is expecting in order to
properly parse an available subscription, but I'm not in a position to do
that. I'll continue to work with this, though, and perhaps may be able to
stumble upon the precise data the Cisco phone is looking for.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0130855) lmadsen (administrator) - 2011-01-21 08:27
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13996#c130855
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The option should probably be named something like....
insecure_publish={yes,no}
Something like that could work I guess?
What is the limiting factor in providing authentication abilities to the
PUBLISH? Is there any code close, or would the whole thing need to be
developed?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2011-01-21 08:27 lmadsen Note Added: 0130855
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list