[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018595]: Asterisk SVN 1.8 running at 99% CPU

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18595 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                zeero
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   18595
Category:                   Core/General
Reproducibility:            random
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.8 
SVN Revision (number only!): 299449 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2011-01-10 21:45 CST
Last Modified:              2011-01-12 05:36 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Asterisk SVN 1.8 running at 99% CPU
Description: 
Asterisk (SVN-branch-1.8-r299449) process is processing calls (10 per
minute) but running at 99% CPU utilisation. The asterisk process runs at
low CPU utilisation for approximately 2 weeks before pegging at 99%
utilisation.
Have tried several asterisk releases with the same issue. 
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0130392) schmidts (manager) - 2011-01-12 05:36
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18595#c130392 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
and you didnt see any locks, right?
normally a high cpu load is only caused by a looping or hanging thread but
even your gdb doesnt show something like this.

can you reproduce this or is it just the now running process and you didnt
have restartet it?

regards
stefan 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2011-01-12 05:36 schmidts       Note Added: 0130392                          
======================================================================