[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018560]: [patch] CEL logging to ODBC field not being stored.
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Apr 28 15:20:46 CDT 2011
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18560
======================================================================
Reported By: zktech
Assigned To: murf
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 18560
Category: CEL/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.8
SVN Revision (number only!): 297535
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-12-30 10:35 CST
Last Modified: 2011-04-28 15:20 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] CEL logging to ODBC field not being stored.
Description:
CEL fields not being updated in ODBC storage.
eventextra field not being stored.
peer field not being stored.
Documentation is incorrect.
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/CEL+Events+and+Fields
cel_odbc.conf
Neither have the eventextra field listed but the cel_custom.conf has it
listed.
The wiki does not have the userdeftype field listed.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
child of 0018559 [patch] CEL logging to ODBC Eventtype e...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0134254) nic (reporter) - 2011-04-28 15:20
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18560#c134254
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just tried this patch against 1.8.4-rc2 on a test machine and it seems it
breaks the Peer / BRIDGEPEER fields and cel_pgsql.
Basically, on 1.8.4-rc2 with no patch, I used to get the peer field filled
in for some events on an attended transfer.
With this patch, peer is not used but neither is BRIDGEPEER (no matter
what I call it nothing get filled in with the patch).
Another question I have is should BRIDGEPEER / peer be used for Event
CEL_BRIDGE_START (id 7)? Ive never seen it filled in for this event and
IMHO it should be.
Nic.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2011-04-28 15:20 nic Note Added: 0134254
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list