[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018024]: Strange Message in 1.6.2 (64 Bits) only

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18024 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                falves11
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   18024
Category:                   Channels/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   trivial
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.6.2 
SVN Revision (number only!): 287759 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-09-21 10:19 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-09-21 17:23 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Strange Message in 1.6.2 (64 Bits) only
Description: 
Every time I start Asterisk or do a simple reload I see this message:
"Cannot open maximum file descriptor 32767 at boot? No such file or
directory"

The people in the Asterisk users list think it is a bug. 
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0127248) falves11 (reporter) - 2010-09-21 17:23
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18024#c127248 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Yes, the error does not pop up anymore. Thanks for your help.
Now, what is the ideal amount for maxfiles there? with 300 open calls, no
media, mostly signaling?

And let's reflect on the "dismissive" behavior of whoever lowered this BUG
to "trivial" from "minor". Before I filed the bug I obviously spent some
hours checking all the usual suspects, and then filed the bug. There is an
attitude problem, pretty consistent, against us "business" users, from the
developers. We are not capable of developing a single line of C, but we
certainly keep the industry working. Guess who pays Digium bills? We do.
Thank you. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-09-21 17:23 falves11       Note Added: 0127248                          
======================================================================