[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0017959]: dahdi_dummy fails compile on Fedora 13 64-bit with kzalloc implicit declaration error
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Sep 7 13:35:29 CDT 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17959
======================================================================
Reported By: glen201
Assigned To: sruffell
======================================================================
Project: DAHDI-linux
Issue ID: 17959
Category: dahdi_dummy
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
JIRA:
Reviewboard Link:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-09-07 08:36 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-09-07 13:35 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: dahdi_dummy fails compile on Fedora 13 64-bit with
kzalloc implicit declaration error
Description:
Debug below is from 2.4.0 but 2.3.0.1 has the same compile time error
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0126687) sruffell (administrator) - 2010-09-07 13:35
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17959#c126687
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I can see how that message would be confusing so I removed from the init
script.
However, DAHDI doesn't have any knowledge about where asterisk is getting
it's timing from (whether res_timing_pthread.so, res_timing_dahdi.so, or
res_timing_timerfd.so). All DAHDI cares about is being able to provide
*some* timing regardless of what spans are configured or how they are
configured.
As for how to tell which timing source asterisk is using:
http://svn.asterisk.org/view/asterisk/trunk/doc/timing.txt?revision=179937
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-09-07 13:35 sruffell Note Added: 0126687
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list