[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017831]: IPv6: SIp show settings doesn't show dual stack support
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Sep 1 17:25:31 CDT 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17831
======================================================================
Reported By: oej
Assigned To: qwell
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 17831
Category: Channels/chan_sip/IPv6
Reproducibility: have not tried
Severity: minor
Priority: high
Status: acknowledged
Target Version: 1.8.0
Asterisk Version: 1.8.0-beta3
JIRA: SWP-2037
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-08-11 04:50 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-09-01 17:25 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: IPv6: SIp show settings doesn't show dual stack
support
Description:
build*CLI> sip show settings
Global Settings:
----------------
UDP Bindaddress: [::]:5060
I suggest that we actually show that we also listen to Ipv4 in "sip show
settings" to clarify. This only on systems that actually do this (there was
an exception in OpenBSD if I understood Simon correctly)
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0126543) qwell (administrator) - 2010-09-01 17:25
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17831#c126543
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have to retract my earlier agreement. Somebody would have to modify
their sip.conf in order to bind to ::, which means they should have already
read the comments in the sample config, regarding this. Adding this text
directly in 'sip show settings' would make the output less uniform and not
be all that useful.
As for the sysctl, it appears from comments that there may be issues with
using it. Is it something we want to suggest using?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-09-01 17:25 qwell Note Added: 0126543
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list