[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0018142]: The TE122 and dadi produces an unusual high load

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18142 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                foxfire
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DAHDI-linux
Issue ID:                   18142
Category:                   wcte12xp
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
JIRA:                        
Reviewboard Link:            
Resolution:                 won't fix
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-10-14 08:33 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-10-20 20:52 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    The TE122 and dadi produces an unusual high load
Description: 
When starting dahdi_linux and there is a TE122 installed in the machine in
a few seconds the load raizes from 0.00 to over 0.50 .
This happens always, i have no problem with any other digium card only the
TE122.
I stopped all services and only started dahdi.
Disabling the mg2 echocancler does not help.
I consider this major because call quality is affected due to the load
increasing to values.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0128258) sruffell (administrator) - 2010-10-20 20:52
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18142#c128258 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Linking a note regarding load average about high load averages on idle
systems with 2.6.35 stable kernels.  Sounded very similar to what foxfire
mentioned when he said "many statistics depend on them."

"Even if it is only statistics, many supervision tools rely on the load
avg, so for production environments, this is not a good thing."

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1042346/focus=1051361

This way I might find it if another discussion regarding load averages
comes up in the future. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-10-20 20:52 sruffell       Note Added: 0128258                          
======================================================================