[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018018]: [patch] Hints for non-existent devices are in an Idle state

Wed Oct 20 10:02:34 CDT 2010

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18018 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                ebroad
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   18018
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Subscriptions
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                       SWP-2283 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 287310 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-09-20 09:37 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-10-20 10:02 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Hints for non-existent devices are in an
Idle state
Description: 
bhn-pbx01*CLI> core show hint 900
900 at broadhn-internal    : SIP/foo             State:Idle           
Watchers  0
1 hint matching extension 900

foo is not a valid SIP device:

bhn-pbx01*CLI> sip show peer foo
Peer foo not found.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0128234) schmidts (manager) - 2010-10-20 10:02
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18018#c128234 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
what happens if you use your patch for another tech like parking slots or
whatever hints could be used against (dont know and use this).

will this also show unavailable? cause i think this could be the reason
for using not_inuse here instead of unavailable

best regards

stefan 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-10-20 10:02 schmidts       Note Added: 0128234                          
======================================================================