[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016946]: Call that clears in same app_dial poll as answer is reported as NOANSWER but NORMAL_CLEARING

Wed Oct 13 18:01:58 CDT 2010

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16946 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                davidw
Assigned To:                twilson
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16946
Category:                   Applications/app_dial
Reproducibility:            sometimes
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Target Version:             1.6.2.15
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                       SWP-984 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:           https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/740/ 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-03-02 13:54 CST
Last Modified:              2010-10-13 18:01 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Call that clears in same app_dial poll as answer is
reported as NOANSWER but NORMAL_CLEARING
Description: 
If a call clears so fast after being answered that app_dial fails to read a
frame before it realises it has been answered, handle_cause breaks from its
switch and does not increment any of its failure reason counters.  The call
ends up with a "No one is available to answer at this time (1:0/0/0)"
message logged, the default DIALSTATUS of NOANSWER and a HANGUPCAUSE of 16
(AST_CAUSE_NORMAL_CLEARING).

If it clears just slightly later, it is treated as a successful, if short
call (that's why it is "sometimes", not "always".

The variablility in the result, depending on precise timing is confusing,
and NOANSWER does not seem an appropriate status.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0127994) svnbot (reporter) - 2010-10-13 18:01
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16946#c127994 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Repository: asterisk
Revision: 291581

_U  branches/1.8/
U   branches/1.8/main/channel.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r291581 | twilson | 2010-10-13 18:01:57 -0500 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) | 35
lines

Merged revisions 291580 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.6.2

................
  r291580 | twilson | 2010-10-13 15:58:43 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) | 28
lines

  Merged revisions 291577 via svnmerge from 
  https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4

  ........
    r291577 | twilson | 2010-10-13 15:45:15 -0700 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) | 21
lines

    Don't ignore frames that have been queued when softhangup'd

    When an outgoing call is answered and hung up by the far end *very*
quickly, we
    may not read any frames and therefor end up with a call that displays
the wrong
    disposition/DIALSTATUS. The reason is because ast_queue_hangup()
immediately
    sets the _softhangup flag on the channel and then queues the HANGUP
control
    frame, but __ast_read refuses to read any frames if ast_check_hangup()
indicates
    that a hangup request has been made (which it will if _softhangup is
set). So,
    we end up losing control frames.

    This change makes __ast_read continue to read frames even if a soft
hangup has
    been requested. It queues a hangup frame to make sure that
__ast_read() will
    still eventually return NULL.

    Much thanks to David Vossel for all of the reviews, discussion, and
help!

    (closes issue https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16946)
    Reported by: davidw

    Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/740/
  ........
................

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=291581 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-10-13 18:01 svnbot         Checkin                                      
2010-10-13 18:01 svnbot         Note Added: 0127994                          
======================================================================