[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018104]: several filename bugs in Record() application

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18104 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                klaus3000
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   18104
Category:                   Applications/app_record
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.8.0-beta5 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-10-07 05:15 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-10-12 02:25 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    several filename bugs in Record() application
Description: 
Hi!

I discovered several issues:

1. %d is not always replaced by an int (maybe caused by special characters
in the filename)

2. if filename is specify relative, the ast_mkdir fails as it is called
with relative filename instead of absolute filename

3. documenation is wrong about RECORDED_FILE variable

4. IMO RECORDED_FILE is incomplete
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0127852) schmidts (manager) - 2010-10-12 02:25
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18104#c127852 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Hallo klaus ;)

i just want to say something about point 1 cause i didnt have looked at
the other points but it looks ok in both cases:

test-%d.wav becomes 
test-0

714-69911160036-2010-10-07T11:35:55+0200%d.wav becomes 
714-69911160036-2010-10-07T11:35:55+02000

so i see the 0 after the filename which looks ok for me, or am i wrong?

best regards
stefan 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-10-12 02:25 schmidts       Note Added: 0127852                          
======================================================================