[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016292]: [patch][regression] DTMF Not Recognized with Exchange UM

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16292 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                rsw686
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16292
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   block
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Target Version:             1.6.1.19
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                       SWP-463 
Regression:                 Yes 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-11-20 09:53 CST
Last Modified:              2010-03-16 14:16 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch][regression] DTMF Not Recognized with
Exchange UM
Description: 
I just upgraded my Asterisk 1.6.1.4 version to 1.6.1.10 and the DTMF tones
are not being recognized by the Exchange UM server. I tested out the RC
release and found that it worked in 1.6.1.7-rc1 and broke in 1.6.1.7-rc2.

What happens is Exchange UM will say to enter your mailbox number. I enter
8532 and it will say that 8 is not a valid entry. It appears Asterisk is
only detecting the first DTMF tone.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0119468) lmadsen (administrator) - 2010-03-16 14:16
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16292#c119468 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Leaving this issue open for a few as the change that went in may need to be
tweaked as it may have broke ABI compatibility in other areas of the code. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-03-16 14:16 lmadsen        Note Added: 0119468                          
======================================================================