[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017006]: [patch] func_odbc query is limited to 15 characters

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17006 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                viniciusfontes
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   17006
Category:                   Functions/func_odbc
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1.17 
JIRA:                       SWP-1065 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-03-11 08:58 CST
Last Modified:              2010-03-11 13:16 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] func_odbc query is limited to 15 characters
Description: 
You can't have a query string longer than 15 characters passed to
ODBC_[NAME] functions. The query string is trimmed to the first 15
characters.

There's a patch to solve this included.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0119273) tilghman (administrator) - 2010-03-11 13:16
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17006#c119273 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Okay, confirmed.  The actual problem is that we did not check to see if the
buffer was full, and most people do not use func_odbc in this way,
preferring to use a real template.  This is why it was not caught before. 
Patch uploaded which fixes the issue in a way that does not recreate a
static buffer.  Larger static buffers could still potentially have the same
problem, which is why your patch wasn't a real fix. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-03-11 13:16 tilghman       Note Added: 0119273                          
======================================================================