[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016708]: [patch] Introduce function for parsing ABNF name-andor-addr = name-addr / addr-spec
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Mar 9 03:08:17 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16708
======================================================================
Reported By: Nick_Lewis
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16708
Category: Channels/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: tweak
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA: SWP-811
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-01-26 10:35 CST
Last Modified: 2010-03-09 03:08 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Introduce function for parsing ABNF
name-andor-addr = name-addr / addr-spec
Description:
Many sip headers in many sip methods contain the ABNF structure
name-andor-addr = name-addr / addr-spec
Examples include the to-header, from-header, contact-header,
replyto-header
At the moment chan_sip.c makes various different attempts to parse this
name-andor-addr structure for each header type and for each sip method with
sometimes limited degrees of success.
I recommend that this name-andor-addr structure be parsed by a dedicated
function and that it be used irrespective of the specific method or header
that contains the name-andor-addr structure
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0119172) Nick_Lewis (reporter) - 2010-03-09 03:08
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16708#c119172
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a number of other patches under construction that depend on this one
so I would be delighted if dvossel could find some time to give it the eye.
I have not used the review board before but would this patch be suitable
there?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-03-09 03:08 Nick_Lewis Note Added: 0119172
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list