[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016834]: [patch] [regression] autofill=no always IGNORED.

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16834 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                kebl0155
Assigned To:                mmichelson
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16834
Category:                   Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.2.2 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-02-16 05:28 CST
Last Modified:              2010-03-03 10:18 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] [regression] autofill=no always IGNORED.
Description: 
Autofill=yes allows calls to be placed to agents from callers who are not
at the front of the queue.

While this may be desirable in some cases, it causes the following
problems in others:

- Callers may get stuck in the queue (particularly with small teams of
agents)
- Wait times and position announcements may be upset if the queue is not
first-come-first-served.

The default behaviour is therefore autofill=no.  However, a bug was
introduced in Asterisk 1.4.25 which overrides this setting.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0118854) kebl0155 (reporter) - 2010-03-03 10:18
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16834#c118854 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I checked the code and I think checking for object equivalence is more
robust than looking at the queue position, so I have amended the patch (see
attached).

This will needs to be applied to the 1.4, 1.6 and 1.6.2 streams. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-03-03 10:18 kebl0155       Note Added: 0118854                          
======================================================================