[asterisk-bugs] [LibPRI 0016909]: [patch] pritimer's in chan_dahdi.conf not honoured
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Mar 1 20:43:24 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16909
======================================================================
Reported By: alecdavis
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: LibPRI
Issue ID: 16909
Category: Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.6.1
SVN Revision (number only!): 248954
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-02-26 02:53 CST
Last Modified: 2010-03-01 20:43 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] pritimer's in chan_dahdi.conf not honoured
Description:
configuring pritimer=>k,3 in chan_dahdi.conf is overwritten by libpri's
pri_default_timers, which defaults 'k' timer back to 7.
required to prevent pri lockups under heavy conditions where switch
doesn't like so many unacknowledge i-frames.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0002518 Provide configurable timers for PRI's
related to 0016790 [patch] !! Got reject for frame 41, ret...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0118732) alecdavis (manager) - 2010-03-01 20:43
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16909#c118732
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Q.921 spec, mentions that it may be advisable to allow 'k' to be user
adjustable, particulary when operating over SAT links.
With that, it suggests 'k' can be more the 1 even on a BRI line. More
clarification needed.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-03-01 20:43 alecdavis Note Added: 0118732
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list