[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017506]: MSG_OOB flag on HANGUP packet misused
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Jun 14 15:51:00 CDT 2010
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17506
======================================================================
Reported By: brycebaril
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 17506
Category: Resources/res_agi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: Older 1.6.2 - please test a newer version
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-06-14 15:51 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-06-14 15:51 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: MSG_OOB flag on HANGUP packet misused
Description:
When using fast AGI and the AGISIGHUP flag is enabled, Asterisk sends an
Out-of-Band "HANGUP\n" packet when the channel is terminated. It uses the
MSG_OOB flag to send it URG/Out-of-Band via TCP.
This TCP feature is generally not used and not reliable (e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol#Out_of_band_data
) and in this case will cause only the "\n" character to be sent OOB. The
"HANGUP" is still sent in-band, and can cause buffering issues --
especially with the "\n" being sent in a different band.
Even if the developer sets socket options to get the OOB data in-band, the
"\n" will come in prior to the "HANGUP" because it is a higher priority.
I suggest dropping the "MSG_OOB" flag from this packet, as it doesn't seem
to do any good, and possibly only does harm.
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-06-14 15:51 brycebaril New Issue
2010-06-14 15:51 brycebaril Asterisk Version => Older 1.6.2 -
please test a newer version
2010-06-14 15:51 brycebaril Regression => No
2010-06-14 15:51 brycebaril SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball
releases) => N/A
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list