[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017501]: [patch] Speex Wideband Support
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Jun 14 15:05:30 CDT 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17501
======================================================================
Reported By: fabled
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 17501
Category: Codecs/codec_speex
Reproducibility: always
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: feedback
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA: SWP-1707
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!): 270075
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-06-12 10:32 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-06-14 15:05 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Speex Wideband Support
Description:
Add support for Speex Wideband (16 kHz) codec.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0123386) fabled (reporter) - 2010-06-14 15:05
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17501#c123386
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I will try to reproduce this. However, the speex specific code in frame.c
does account for wideband frames properly. It would look like as either of
the clients is sending corrupted stuff (like the error indicates). I
checked and the limit of two wideband frames in row is imposed by libspeex
too.
Do you get the same error if you use the speex narrowband mode
(allow=speex)?
Would it be possible to get tcpdump capture of the packets when this
happens?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-06-14 15:05 fabled Note Added: 0123386
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list