[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016792]: [patch] 606 Not Acceptable is also a valid response to reject a T.38 re-INVITE

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 0016692. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16792 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                vrban
Assigned To:                mmichelson
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16792
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/T.38
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
JIRA:                       SWP-888 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-02-09 07:14 CST
Last Modified:              2010-06-01 09:51 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] 606 Not Acceptable is also a valid response
to reject a T.38 re-INVITE
Description: 
If we get a "606 Not Acceptable" to our T.38 re-INVITE, then we should also
send start the re-re-INVITE to audio faxing.

See:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-realtimefax-01#section-6.2
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0016692 [patch] Missing fallback to audio fax f...
====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-06-01 09:51 pabelanger     Relationship added       related to 0016692  
======================================================================