[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017616]: [patch] Configure sets ac_cv_fork_works=no incorrectly for uclibc

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17616 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                pprindeville
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   17616
Category:                   Core/BuildSystem
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:           1.6.2.9 
JIRA:                       SWP-1835 
Regression:                 Yes 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-07-09 12:47 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-07-09 14:26 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Configure sets ac_cv_fork_works=no
incorrectly for uclibc
Description: 
The generated top-level configure contains:

if test "x$ac_cv_func_fork_works" = xcross; then
 case $host in
  *-*-amigaos* | *-*-msdosdjgpp* | *-*-uclinux* | *-*-linux-uclibc* )
    # Override, as these systems have only a dummy fork() stub
    ac_cv_func_fork_works=no
    ;;

this is wrong.  The linux-uclibc fork() works just fine.


====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0124421) lmadsen (administrator) - 2010-07-09 14:26
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17616#c124421 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
(02:20:25 PM) jparker: I made that change.  I don't recall why.  The change
was explicitly to add what he's asking to remove. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-07-09 14:26 lmadsen        Note Added: 0124421                          
======================================================================