[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016359]: [patch] Only the last setvar is effective for a given channel
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Jan 19 10:54:16 CST 2010
The following issue is now READY FOR REVIEW.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16359
======================================================================
Reported By: raarts
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16359
Category: Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for review
Asterisk Version: 1.6.2.0-rc6
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2009-12-01 03:53 CST
Last Modified: 2010-01-19 10:54 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Only the last setvar is effective for a
given channel
Description:
Other setvar's are forgotten. This is because the code in mkintf() assumes
that the vars pointer only points to one variable strust, where in fact it
can point to a whole list of them.
One line patch attached.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0116914) lmadsen (administrator) - 2010-01-19 10:54
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16359#c116914
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Moving to "Ready for Review" after a positive test case. Additional testers
are always welcome!
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-01-19 10:54 lmadsen Note Added: 0116914
2010-01-19 10:54 lmadsen Status ready for testing =>
ready for review
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list