[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0013483]: [patch] Add TDMoE Multi-Frame support
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sat Jan 16 04:54:27 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13483
======================================================================
Reported By: JBenden
Assigned To: kpfleming
======================================================================
Project: DAHDI-linux
Issue ID: 13483
Category: dahdi_dynamic
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
JIRA:
Reviewboard Link:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-09-15 04:17 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-01-16 04:54 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Add TDMoE Multi-Frame support
Description:
A patch against SVN rev 4904, to add TDMoE Multi-Frame support as described
in the article at the following URL:
http://www.thrallingpenguin.com/articles/tdmoe-mf.htm
TDMoE-MF is known to be implemented in hardware solutions from Redfone
Communications.
This patch additionally implements RCU within dahdi_dynamic to decrease
lock contention, latency, and context switching. Because of the use of RCU
locking, all prior known issues with loading and unloading of the modules
are resolved, providing the spans are shutdown with "dahdi_cfg -s".
It also contains an attempt, which works, at fixing a kernel change with
skb_linearize(). The use of kernel version number does not work with SuSE
SLES 10, as it appears they have backported the 2.6.18 change in to their
2.6.16 version.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate 0012241 [patch] New Ztdynamic driver for Redfon...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0116775) Max Khon (manager) - 2010-01-16 04:54
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=13483#c116775
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the use of RCU API really worth it? It is not very portable and in
exactly this use-case I do not see any major benefits vs. using simple
rwlocks.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-01-16 04:54 Max Khon Note Added: 0116775
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list