[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016502]: [patch] port in users.conf is not honored in the register statement

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16502 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                steinwej
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16502
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Registration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0.20 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-12-22 14:14 CST
Last Modified:              2010-01-04 10:19 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] port in users.conf is not honored in the
register statement
Description: 
VoIP provider has SIP port set to 9060

The account for the provider is defined in users.conf as follows:

[testuser]
context = DID_test
host = voipprovider.com
port = 9060
username = testuser
fromuser = testuser
fromdomain = 
secret = verysecret
insecure = no
trunkname = tname
hasiax = no
registeriax = no
hassip = yes
registersip = yes
trunkstyle = voip
hasexten = no
disallow = all
allow = alaw,gsm,adpcm

it is expected that the account testuser registers at voipprovider.com.
But registration fails because * send the REGISTER to the default SIP port
5060



====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0115908) steinwej (reporter) - 2010-01-04 10:19
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16502#c115908 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
No, as per trunk, there is no example of the usage of 'port'. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-01-04 10:19 steinwej       Note Added: 0115908                          
======================================================================