[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016664]: [patch] Random DTMF duplicate emulation on bridged OOH323 channel on outgoing calls

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16664 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                vmikhelson
Assigned To:                may213
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16664
Category:                   Addons/chan_ooh323
Reproducibility:            random
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0.20 
JIRA:                        
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-01-21 00:44 CST
Last Modified:              2010-02-24 22:30 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Random DTMF duplicate emulation on bridged
OOH323 channel on outgoing calls
Description: 
In majority of cases DTMF tones are duplicated by Asterisk when bridging a
SIP or DAHDI channel with OOH323 channel on outgoing calls.

In case of a normal DTMF processing the following sequence is observed:

[Jan 20 19:59:56] DTMF[21084]: channel.c:2855 __ast_read: DTMF begin '9'
received on SIP/464-00000012
[Jan 20 19:59:56] DTMF[21084]: channel.c:2865 __ast_read: DTMF begin
passthrough '9' on SIP/464-00000012
[Jan 20 19:59:56] DTMF[21084]: channel.c:2783 __ast_read: DTMF end '9'
received on SIP/464-00000012, duration 120 ms
[Jan 20 19:59:56] DTMF[21084]: channel.c:2823 __ast_read: DTMF end
accepted with begin '9' on SIP/464-00000012
[Jan 20 19:59:56] DTMF[21084]: channel.c:2839 __ast_read: DTMF end
passthrough '9' on SIP/464-00000012

In case of a problematic DTMF processing it looks like that:

[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2855 __ast_read: DTMF begin '9'
received on SIP/464-00000011
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2865 __ast_read: DTMF begin
passthrough '9' on SIP/464-00000011
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2783 __ast_read: DTMF end '9'
received on OOH323/172.17.135.2:1720-9915, duration 0 ms
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2809 __ast_read: DTMF begin
emulation of '9' with duration 100 queued on OOH323/172.17.135.2:1720-9915
[Jan 20 19:18:54] WARNING[20916]: chan_ooh323.c:1054 ooh323_indicate:
Don't know how to indicate condition 20 on ooh323c_o_21
[Jan 20 19:18:54] WARNING[20916]: chan_ooh323.c:1054 ooh323_indicate:
Don't know how to indicate condition 20 on ooh323c_o_21
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2932 __ast_read: DTMF end
emulation of '9' queued on OOH323/172.17.135.2:1720-9915
[Jan 20 19:18:54] WARNING[20916]: chan_ooh323.c:1054 ooh323_indicate:
Don't know how to indicate condition 20 on ooh323c_o_21
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2783 __ast_read: DTMF end '9'
received on SIP/464-00000011, duration 120 ms
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2823 __ast_read: DTMF end
accepted with begin '9' on SIP/464-00000011
[Jan 20 19:18:54] DTMF[20916]: channel.c:2839 __ast_read: DTMF end
passthrough '9' on SIP/464-00000011
[Jan 20 19:18:55] WARNING[20916]: chan_ooh323.c:1054 ooh323_indicate:
Don't know how to indicate condition 20 on ooh323c_o_21

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0118529) vmikhelson (reporter) - 2010-02-24 22:30
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16664#c118529 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
May213,

As you see the ooh323 call drop occurs not exactly at 394 as I observed
originally.

It can be 392, 393 or 394 seconds.

Thank you,
Vladimir 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-02-24 22:30 vmikhelson     Note Added: 0118529                          
======================================================================