[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016856]: [regression] Blind transfers initiated from calling party aren't disconncted
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Feb 24 09:59:37 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16856
======================================================================
Reported By: rsw686
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16856
Category: Applications/app_transfer
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: acknowledged
Asterisk Version: 1.6.1.14
JIRA: SWP-951
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-02-17 14:08 CST
Last Modified: 2010-02-24 09:59 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [regression] Blind transfers initiated from calling
party aren't disconncted
Description:
Employee A calls a customer and talks for a few minutes. The customer asks
to talk to someone in another depart. Employee A does a blind transfer with
## to Employee B. The result is Employee B is connected to the customer.
However Employee A receives the all circuits are busy now message. What
should happen is Employee A is disconnected. I was originally using
Asterisk 1.6.1.4, but have tested Asterisk 1.6.1.14 with the same result.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0118477) lmadsen (administrator) - 2010-02-24 09:59
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16856#c118477
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If someone could provide an example of the dialplan and configuration along
with the steps to reproduce this issue then that would be useful. That way
it can be tested against 1.4.21 to see what happened then (presumably the
right way) and then try a newer version to see the regression.
Console output of the two issues being tested on the versions would
certainly be useful as well if someone wanted to go that far.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-02-24 09:59 lmadsen Note Added: 0118477
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list