[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016698]: gotoiftime does not work as expected for date range

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Feb 2 10:10:33 CST 2010


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16698 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                Nick_Lewis
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   16698
Category:                   PBX/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.2.X 
JIRA:                       SWP-819 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-01-25 11:53 CST
Last Modified:              2010-02-02 10:10 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    gotoiftime does not work as expected for date range
Description: 
In the middle of December I set a time condition using the gotoiftime
dialplan application from Dec24 to Jan3. It worked correctly over this
holiday period and switched off after Jan3. However on Jan24 it switched on
again. This is not the operation that I expected.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0117532) tilghman (administrator) - 2010-02-02 10:10
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16698#c117532 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
You may think so, but this is a feature request, not a bug report.  The
fact is that it does not work this way, and you've simply misunderstood the
syntax. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-02-02 10:10 tilghman       Note Added: 0117532                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list