[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018476]: Codec negotiation algorithm
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Dec 15 13:19:26 UTC 2010
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18476
======================================================================
Reported By: manzo_zeti
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 18476
Category: Codecs/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.6.2.15
JIRA:
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-12-15 07:19 CST
Last Modified: 2010-12-15 07:19 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Codec negotiation algorithm
Description:
According to the provided documentation ( sip.conf ), when Asterisk is
placing a call the CODEC used will be the first CODEC in the allowed
CODEC's that the caller indicates that it supports.
So if, for instance, we have the following setup:
[caller]
disallow=all
allow=g729
allow=alaw
[called]
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=gsm
RTP stream from caller to called would be transcoded from $WATHEVER to
G.729.
Such behavior is sub-optimal when $CUSTOMERS devices come in the scene
since
we can't be sure that our configured codec preferences are the same as
theirs.
I think Asterisk should place call using the first CODEC sent by the
caller in the INVITE message that [caller] indicates that it supports.
======================================================================
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-12-15 07:19 manzo_zeti New Issue
2010-12-15 07:19 manzo_zeti Asterisk Version => 1.6.2.15
2010-12-15 07:19 manzo_zeti Regression => No
2010-12-15 07:19 manzo_zeti SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball
releases) => N/A
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list