[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0018189]: RFC2833 DTMF generation broken due to SSRC change on bridges channels
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sat Dec 4 16:09:51 CST 2010
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18189
======================================================================
Reported By: marcbou
Assigned To: jpeeler
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 18189
Category: Core/RTP
Reproducibility: always
Severity: block
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Target Version: 1.8.1
Asterisk Version: 1.8.0
JIRA: SWP-2473
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-10-22 12:13 CDT
Last Modified: 2010-12-04 16:09 CST
======================================================================
Summary: RFC2833 DTMF generation broken due to SSRC change on
bridges channels
Description:
Since upgrading to the latest 1.8.0-rc, DTMF digits sent over SIP/RTP to
our service provider were no longer being detected.
We analyzed packet dumps, comparing old and new RTP packets being
generated by asterisk.
The difference was tracked down to asterisk 1.8.0-rc now changing the SSRC
value for RFC2833 DTMF digit packets.
If in main/channel.c:ast_channel_bridge() I comment out
ast_indicate(c0, AST_CONTROL_SRCCHANGE);
ast_indicate(c1, AST_CONTROL_SRCCHANGE);
the SSRC no longer changes for DTMF digits and the provider can detect
them again.
However I am not sure if the change doesn't adversely affect other things.
Please advise.
Kind regards,
Marc Boucher
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0018352 SSRC is changing when DTMF sent
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0129308) jpeeler (administrator) - 2010-12-04 16:09
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18189#c129308
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I think that's the approach I'm going to take. cmbaker - I do not
think I was ever able to actually reproduce the delay. Can you describe how
you or your client is doing so?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-12-04 16:09 jpeeler Note Added: 0129308
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list